Two focused engagements for teams that need durable agent memory or clearer local-first system boundaries. Scope, artifacts, and exclusions are visible before the conversation begins.
Both offers end in artifacts your team can inspect and retain. Neither hides discovery, implementation, and assurance inside an ambiguous consulting package.
Connect one supported coding-agent host to a local memory path, ingest one agreed repository, exercise diagnostics, and demonstrate one witnessed recall path.
Map the ownership and failure boundaries across memory, MCP tools, model providers, policy, receipts, and recovery—then turn the findings into an actionable design note.
Open-source adoption, engineering services, and the commercial Pro overlay solve different problems. They should never be blurred into one vague call to action.
Use the public memory stack and installation guidance directly. No sales conversation is required.
Choose an install path →Use one of the two bounded engagements above when integration or architecture judgment is the constraint.
Open a conversation ↗For Release Gate, Verify Patch, proof packets, Forge administration, and Agent Guard posture workflows.
Review Pro scope →No deck or polished brief is required. Four concrete inputs are enough to decide whether a conversation is warranted.
The agent host, repository type, deployment boundary, and relevant languages.
What prevents progress today: continuity, retrieval, authority, recovery, or evidence.
What must be observable or retained when the engagement is complete.
Data residency, network, security, timeline, or integration constraints that cannot move.